Paper Three - Punishment (Subject to Revision)

Due: Dec. 10

The final paper will be on the philosophical justification of punishment. You will present the theory you think provides the best grounds for justifying punishment while explaining how this is used to support an opinion or dissenting opinion in a Supreme Court case and defending the position from what you see as the most serious criticism. In reviewing this assignment, it is possible to identify three areas your paper must cover.

First, your paper must present the argument either a utilitarian/deterrence or retributivist theorist would present for supporting the institution of punishment. You will need to state the position you hold and then present the reasons that support this position and explain why they justify punishment on either the grounds of deterrence or retribution.

Second, you will then show how this theory is used by one of the justices in presenting an opinion or dissenting opinion. This will require addressing several points. One is to state the opinion or dissenting opinion of the case you will focus on, and the second is to clearly articulate the argument presented. Third, you will need to identify where in the argument you can identify the philosophical position the justice relies on in the argument. Fourth, you must clarify why the argument of the justice is an example of the particular theory of the justification of punishment you are presenting.

Fifth, you must present a criticism of the theory of punishment and explain how you can meet and overcome that criticism. In doing this be sure to clearly state the criticism and explain why it is problematic for the theory.

This paper will require two additional sources of information.

Finally, before you write the paper, you will be required to submit a prewriting outline of your paper. This must be emailed to my by Friday, Dec. 2 at noon. I will then email you comments on your prewriting assignment. Specific details will be available online.

If you have any questions, let me know.

Rubric

Theory of punishment (0-60)

 

 

 

Identification of the main points of the
(0-25)

Three or more points are not presented; four or more are not clearly stated (0-9)

Two points are not presented; two or three are not clearly stated (10-19)

All the general points are presented (20-25)

Explanation of points (0-35)

Three or more points are not clearly explained (0-14)

One or two points are not clearly explained (15-28)

All the points are clearly explained (29-35)

 

 

 

 

The opinion/dissent of the cases (0-30)

 

 

 

Statement of facts of the opinion/dissent (0-10)

Three or more acts are left out; the opinion is inaccurately stated (0-4)

One or two main facts are left out; the opinion is not clearly stated (4-7)

The facts and opinion are clearly and accurately summarized (8-10)

Explanation of the rationale (0-20)

No explanation (0-8)

A preliminary or unclear explanation of the rationale is presented (9-15)

A clear explanation of the rationale is offered (16-20)

 

 

 

 

Justification of how the opinion/dissent rests on theory (0-20)

No explanation of why theory would disagree/agree with opinion/dissent (0-8)

Preliminary but incomplete explanation of why theory would agree with opinion/dissent (9-15)

Complete and clearly stated explanation why theory would agree with opinion/dissent (16-20)

 

 

 

 

Criticism and Response(0-45)

 

 

 

State and explain criticism (0-25)

No criticism is presented (0-11)

A criticism is stated but is not clearly explained (12-19)

A clearly stated criticism is offered and explained (20-25)

Response to criticism (0-20)

No response is presented (0-8)

The response is not clearly stated or explained (9-15)

The response is clearly explained (16-20)

 

 

 

 

Overall (0-20)

 

 

 

 

The paper has deficiencies in three or more areas (0-8)

The paper has deficiencies in two areas (9-15)

There is deficiencies in one or fewer areas (16-20)

       
Prewrite/Outline (0-25) Due Dec. 2. Minus two points for each day late.    

Philosophy of Law Page

Back to Schedule

Back to Syllabus

Back to Main Page


 

 

 


Paper 3 - Punishment
teall@msmc.edu
Mount Saint Mary College, Newburgh, New York